The Fort Smith Board of Directors voted Tuesday (May 5) night to approve a zoning change that allows for construction of a controversial subdivision proposed by the Fort Smith Housing Authority.
A 57-unit single-family affordable housing — known as Clayton Heights — in a mixed income area was sought after the city board approved March 3 a zoning change requested by the Williams Lane neighborhood association. That zoning change nixed the authority’s original proposal. This new project is similar to what was approved by the city on North Sixth Street with the North Pointe development. The property is presently zoned to allow the development, and the authority has spent about $150,000 to prepare the project.
But the board voted Tuesday to reject an attempt by the neighborhood association — directed by Reva Stover — to include property owned by the authority in a more restrictive zoning class. Instead, the board approved a zoning change that did not include the authority’s property.
Stover said after the vote that the board’s action “sends a message that the future of that area is for housing that will definitely devalue our property.” She said a court injunction is the only way to stop the housing project, but she declined to say if that would be something the association will pursue.
“That’s a big step. We will have to think about that,” Stover said.
Ken Pyle, director of the Fort Smith Housing Authority, said he was grateful for the board vote and appreciative of the board’s dedication to hearing from all sides.
“I think they (board) saw that we had addressed all the legitimate concerns,” Pyle said after the vote.
BOARD DISCUSSION
The discussion prior to the vote began with Pyle reminding the board that the authority on numerous times met with Williams Lane homeowners and changed the project several times to respond to their concerns. One of the changes included pulling duplexes out of the project.
Stover talked about the future potential of the unique area and said the Williams Lane neighborhood association is supportive of growth, but wants to be able to address every new project that comes to the area to make sure it is a good fit.
“We want to see a future for our area that is different” from other North side areas, Stover noted.
Gerald Stover said the goal of the rezoning effort is to ensure that a large number of homes aren’t built in the area.
City Director Cole Goodman, the first city director to comment, cut to the chase by saying, “I personally don’t like this development.” Goodman said there are other areas of town where such projects could be built, and encouraged the housing authority to consider infill (development on small parcels near existing structures) development.
Pyle responded by saying that the authority is doing infill, with have six homes underway. He said two will be ready for sale in June.
Director Kevin Settle wanted to know why the authority was so persistent to build in the Williams Lane area. Pyle reminded Settle that the land was given to the authority.
“The land was free,” Pyle said.
City Director Gary Campbell moved to approve the zoning changed that allowed for the Clayton Heights development. City Directors Campbell, Andre Good, Cole Goodman Don Hutchings and Bill Maddox voted for the motion. City Directors Settle and Steve Tyler opposed it.
http://www.swtimes.com/news/article_db9b7b0a-b5d5-11df-96c2-001cc4c03286.html
The reporter forgot to mention the rude, ignorant moderator comment regarding "funerals" as well a the deliberately assigned questions from the audience.
Water has always been my weak spot....well, one of them. I admit that I have many. It's funny how the same symptoms apply for both ends of the spectrum, in regards to how we respond to certain stimuli. Natural water sources turn me rigid - my mind goes cloudy, my muscles are taut, and an uncontrollable tremble takes over.
We haven't heard much from him with regard to the verdict in his DWI trial last week. Perhaps it did not go as he planned?
I have been watching these Boards and occasionally commenting for the last year or so. Its great that everyone is free to express their opinions and for that we should thank God we live in this country. However, the expression of opinions is usually negative, which gets old sometimes. Can we make a deal? How about everyone of the regulars on this Board reply to this Blog
Recent Comments
2 hours 21 min ago
6 hours 54 min ago
7 hours 19 min ago
7 hours 31 min ago
7 hours 39 min ago
7 hours 42 min ago
8 hours 46 min ago
9 hours 12 min ago
9 hours 31 min ago
10 hours 33 min ago