The thing you need to know about Fort Smith Mayor Ray Baker is that he’s tremendously more interested in ensuring cheap and convenient television access to local religious programming and Lawrence Welk reruns than he is in ensuring the necessary forms of broadband/digital connections and service that the successful economies of tomorrow are installing today or installed yesterday.
No, that’s not true.
The simpleton rose-petal tosser wouldn’t understand anything in that first sentence after the word “reruns,” and therefore is 100% focused on his petulant bullying of a private sector business that finds itself between our Napoleonic twit and the overwhelming customer demand to add more Internet and digital television.
That’s the thing you need to know about Mayor Baker.
And his incessant bitching and moaning about Cox Communications and the company’s moving of television channels was a mere annoyance until Mar. 2. Like your mom always said: “It’s all fun and games until someone puts an eye out.” Well, The Mayor has just poked the collective community in the eye.
Let’s stop to background a little on how we ended up with a mayor and city board that recently passed a resolution that told the world we’d rather not be inconvenienced with telecom progress. Maybe next week we’ll install the telegraph thingies they have on display at the Fort Smith Museum of History to send a message to folks outside our metro area: “Your new communication advances are coming too fast. Stop. Yes. Stop. Please stop. Stop. Just stop. Stop.”
Here’s the deal on the background. Cox Communications is one of two telecoms (AT&T being the other) who have a franchise agreement with the city of Fort Smith. Such an agreement is essentially a fancy right-of-way allowance in which Cox collects around $500,000 a year from us citizens and delivers the money to the city to satisfy the city's right-of-way demands.
Many years ago, Cox Communications and cable companies around the country delivered television via an analog system. And then a bunch of smart people conspired against Mayor Baker and his octogenarian supporters and discovered clever ways to package a boatload of information through digital means. What that means for Cox is that with the physical and electronic space it takes to send one channel on the lower tier, the company can package four high-definition channels and/or create more room for Internet access.
The lower-numbered channels on the system were the old analog (non-digital) channels and carried the local access stuff where Reverend Jimmy Don Greasy at the Good Suit Baptist Church and his direct message from God would be packaged between The Lennon Sisters who were “Wunnerful, wunnerful,” and a TBS “Gunsmoke” marathon.
But Fort Smithians, it seems, like the digital stuff. We can’t get enough of it. Requests for more high-def channels and faster Internet outnumbers all other requests 10 to 1. And when Cox moves a channel, it’s based on viewership. You know, like a restaurant will clear the menu of the liver-n-onions when only one out of every 1,000 customers order it. Why load up the freezer with that nasty iron-loaded meat when it gets ordered as often as Snoop Dogg music gets requested at the Ray Baker Senior Center?
The facts and true demands of Fort Smithians have no bearing on a mayor whose socio-economic and cultural realities are stuck in the middle of the past century when Caucasians and Blacks and Hispanics all knew their place. The only fact that matters to The Mayor is that Cox represents change, and change means his preferences and beliefs are no longer in the majority.
The same mayor who recently told a citizen at a board meeting to not always be negative has nothing but negative spewing from his mouth when Cox is the topic. Between the Fort Smith Police Department, Fort Smith Classic and other area charities, Cox has pushed at least $100,000 into the community within the past 18 months. Go ahead. Look for a simple “Thank You,” from the mayor on that front. Good luck.
Which means the thing you need to know about The Mayor is that he doesn’t have a clue. The Internet to The Mayor might as well be a fanciful potion mentioned in a Harry Potter novel.
A recent report by SpendingPulse notes that eCommerce — the sale of goods and services across the Internet — ended February with 16.7% year-over-year growth. It was the seventh straight month of double-digit growth. All other retail sales have been in the crapper for the past seven months. People less interested in local church programming and the Wunnerful, wunnerful television of decades past are using the high-demand services Cox is working to offer locally to boost the regional economies in which they are based.
And the mayors in Topeka and Peoria and other large and small cities around the country are in a race to push emphatic resolutions to Google in hopes of gaining the favor of the giganticus search engine company in its plan to experimentally place super-duper high-speed broadband in a few places around the U.S.
But not Mayor Baker. Or the Fort Smith City Board. Nosirree. We passed a resolution Mar. 2 “encouraging Cox Communications to restore programming to channel tiers accessible to subscribers without digital service.” For Google execs, that was the equivalent of asking for a return to rotary-dial phones.
“These companies looking at Fort Smith, I’m concerned, because I don’t them want to see us looking back at the way things were,” Tyler said.
Good said he is concerned that at some point Cox execs will grow weary of The Mayoral badgering and make future multimillion dollar telecom infrastructure investments in communities that get it.
“That was dumb on so many levels,” Good said when asked about the board’s Mar. 2 approval of the resolution.
Two city directors who voted for the resolution said they did so rather than fight the mayor. They suggested the resolution was meaningless. They don’t get it either. The same demand pushing Cox to seek more high-def and Internet space means folks all around the world can see us fumbling about with one eye poked out by a mayor who probably thinks you need a zip code for a Web address.
The resolution approved by the board complained like a spoiled six-year-old that television “programming isn’t as accessible to subscribers as it once was.”
And that’s the thing you need to know about Mayor Baker. He’s more concerned about “as it once was.” When our leaders are focused on “as it once was,” they aren’t working on “as it could be.”
The other thing you need to know about Mayor Baker is that he needs to be the next analog channel we move.
http://www.swtimes.com/news/article_db9b7b0a-b5d5-11df-96c2-001cc4c03286.html
The reporter forgot to mention the rude, ignorant moderator comment regarding "funerals" as well a the deliberately assigned questions from the audience.
Water has always been my weak spot....well, one of them. I admit that I have many. It's funny how the same symptoms apply for both ends of the spectrum, in regards to how we respond to certain stimuli. Natural water sources turn me rigid - my mind goes cloudy, my muscles are taut, and an uncontrollable tremble takes over.
We haven't heard much from him with regard to the verdict in his DWI trial last week. Perhaps it did not go as he planned?
I have been watching these Boards and occasionally commenting for the last year or so. Its great that everyone is free to express their opinions and for that we should thank God we live in this country. However, the expression of opinions is usually negative, which gets old sometimes. Can we make a deal? How about everyone of the regulars on this Board reply to this Blog
Change
It's time to get someone in a position of change. It's Not me. It's above my pay scale, but I feel like there must be someone in Ft Smith that could fit the bill. I see, read and here from a few here in Ft Smith that could be a good leader and wish they would step up. I know how hard it is to tap into the old way of life here in Ft Smith and the old money. But I beg the one's that are capable, to consider the post and talk it over with your friends and family. We need a Change in the worst way and you know it. You have lived here and see the change that is needed. So talk among yourself and mull it over. Good Luck!
Michael has no clue
I was totally shocked to read this article. It seems that people now a days are using any means they can to demonize our leaders and really don't have a clue as to where they are coming from. People like Michael Tilley think they are the enlightened ones who have all the answers to man kinds problems by means of attacking and critiing. Why doesn't Michael put his ideas into action and run for office himself and see if he and his ideas are electable. Any one at all who has spend time with Mayor Baker knows that his core motives are in the right place. We need someone zealous to protect and promote those less fortunate by standing up to a large corporation such as Cox who appears seems to be more concerned about technology and profitablity than to the people that they serve. Maybe I am one of those people who don't have a clue also in trying to look after the people who can't look after themselves, who don't have a voice and who are not well enough to come the meetings or have a venue to share their concerns and complaints like Michael Tilley does. I frankly don't feel sorry for Cox. Why couldn't they find another means to further their business? If sacrificeing much of the community at the altar of technology and profitablity then I say find another way. Mayor Baker puts people first that is his passion. People like Michael Tilley seem to put people last. Maybe Michael should come to a rose pedal throwing event and celebrate the accomplishments of our citizens. Come to a Habitat dedication or honoring a Good neighbor event. Maybe you will begin to see that it is about people and not always economic growth, tecnology, and so on. Quality of place is where people are treated with the quality of consideration, respect, honor, loyalty,love,and concern. All the other stuff will fall into place.
No clue
Our leaders demonize everything and anything to get votes from the gullible and fearful.....Sound familiar??
no clue???
I find it funny how some people are putting the accessibility of television channels over the need for progress. It really is sad when "caring for the people" is comprised more of making sure they can see Lawrence Welk instead of making sure that their local economy thrives, offering them more personal stability, and more employment / financial opportunities. Why can't anyone see that what frustrates Tilley so, is the fact that no one cares about the future of our economy or how we can advance in a competitive way technologically? We care more about making everything look nice and making sure that the old "tried and true" prevails than making sure that we can survive in an ever-changing world! While you watch AETN, opportunities are passing us by, and it's not you who will suffer in the long run. You'll die off peacefully, happy that you got to spend your life enjoying the same television channels that you watched since childhood, while my children will move off to look for employment opportunities and a better quality of life in a neighboring city / state.
Now you may think me harsh, not considering the needs of those poor people who can't afford all of Cox's fancy-shmansy digital offers. Maybe you think I'm an avid supporter of Cox, a long-time customer who has enjoyed years of service. Maybe you think a cocky, spoiled "youngster" like me doesn't understand what it's like to be deprived of television... Allow me to set the record straight.
I'm a single mother of two. I don't have a single television channel in my home. I survive just fine. Sometimes, I actually do a puzzle, or read a book. Sometimes, I'll take a risk and go outside. Sometimes - crazy as it seems - I will spend time with my children in a park, or coloring a picture. The point is, caring about the "need" for all people to be able to access channels like they "used to", can cause major opportunities for progress to pass by, ripping apart a possility of what "can be".
Thanks, Mayor Baker. You jusdt made "life worth living" somewhere else...
No clue anonymous is projecting
You project your own cluelessness into this issue. All the hype over petty pet issues about a cable tv station availability serves to divert attention from real serious issues concerning fiscal responsibility, crime, social services,etc. Cheerleading if fine, let Ray do it. But he needs to stay out of the way of real problem solving lest he becomes the problem.
Mayor Ray is Great at What he Does
You are correct, Mayor Baker is great at what he does. He is passionate about Fort Smith, about the people and is deeply committed to improving quality of life the best he can. Anyone that has been around him 5 minutes knows that.
Where most are off base about why Fort Smith isn't this or isn't that, it has nothing to do with the ceremonial head of this city - Mayor Baker. If you want the city head to provide leadership and be run like a CEO, hire a CEO - oh that's right we have one - it's called the city administrator.
You see ladies and gentlemen, the city administrator, asst administrators, and board of directors LEAD this community. Have ever since this form of government was invented. You don't like the direction, ELECT people with vision, drive and clear vision.
The CEREMONIAL head of the city is the Mayor. And he does a great job at what he is suppose to do - ceremonies.
If you want to elect a new mayor to be a CEO - you get what you elect - as the old saying goes too many cooks spoil the .........
Great at what he does,
Great BS. He should emcee a remake of Howdy Dowdy Time.
Howdy Dowdy
And you can be Clarabell
If his position is purely ceremonial
then perhaps he should stop ceremonially pursuing resolutions and ceremonially interjecting his opinions in policy involving city government and declaring ceremonial wars on drugs, immigrants, etc. Or perhaps we can get a ceremonial mayor who will pass ceremonial resolutions in favor of Google or any other ceremonial forward-thinking matter.
Agreed if his position is ceremonial
If so then the Mayor should not have a vote and should not even chair the directors meetings. What's more he should not publicized negative aspects of our community if he is indeed upbeat. His latest pronouncement of a war on drugs, gangs, illegals,etc is a public relations failure. If we have these crime problems fix it quietly so as not to become a public deterrent to new settlers to Fort Smith. I retired and resettled here from a place where the effects of crime is obvious so nobody was surprised. When touring Fort Smith I was struck by the virtual nonexistence of bars on windows of homes and businesses.....That in itself speaks volumes. The minimal graffitti was another clue as to the degree of delinquent and criminal activity. So when the Mayor creates an issue pandering to fear and racism, perhaps in line with other right wingers who are trying to pander re-election votes, he ultimately damages this cities
reputation as a relatively safe place. It is commendable if Ray Baker wants to keep the city safe as we all do, but that is the police' responsibility.
The mayor fails to differentiate between illegal alien hard workers and illegal alien drug dealers. What about legal citizens who deal drugs. His whole melodramatic pronouncement is inappropriate except for a crazy old man.
Enough.
Illegal Immigration
This is in reponse to the person that stated that Mayor does not differentiate between types of illegal immigrants. Illegal Immigrants ARE breaking the law by being here illegally. Illegal Immigrants that peddle drugs or break laws of a country to which they hold no allegience is an already huge and still growing problem. The specifics of the newest drug variety and its huge influx into "middle America" have been profiled by wall to wall exposes in both tv and print media over the last several months. They have even pinpointed the origin down to specific groups of families and specific cities where the new cheaper drugs are coming from.
This is not racist or prejudice, just fact. The Mayor has no doubt been seeing the alarming coverage. His heart is in the right place.
Our Chief of police appears as a person "ducking the question" or ignorant of the issue when he recently stated that he sees no connection between illegals and drugs. Every other law enforcement agency does!! Just look at the drug arrests in our local paper. Talk to a immigration official
Has anyone ever looked into the "Torres Tours" buses that constantly drop off illegals into our cities northside??? Get your head out of the sand.
Yeah, Right !!
Fair and balanced too, you betcha!!
Illegal and "ILLEGAL"
You still mix apples with oranges. Illegal workers are not the same as illegal drug dealers. Many of the workers are caught in a bureaucratic mess. All of the drug dealers' activity is more damaging. With limited resources our leaders need to choose their battles wisely and realistically,not politically.
Same
They are both illegal that is the point. Don't try to diminish the illegal activities of the illegal border jumpers by comparing them to the illegal activities of the drug dealers who by the way are illegal border jumpers as well. that doesn't makes their illegal law breaking activities any better.
Our limited resources is exactly what people worry about when they dispare on the millions of illegals pouring over our borders.
Tell you what, why don't you bleeding heart libs go across the border and try preaching your bilge from there. I'd like to see how far you get.
Torres Tours
Tour buses stopping at the latino market on Midland, what are they delivering?
The produce truck from Nogales at Barquito store, what is it delivering?
Nafta made it easier to bring contraband across the border, that's a fact.
So what RayBay's heart is in the right place. So is mine and yours, yet we are not foolish mascots on the city payroll spreading misinformation and simpleton cheer.
Fact check
This is neither in favor of nor against the gist of the article; I just hate to see misperceptions...
"If so then the Mayor should not have a vote and should not even chair the directors meetings."
The mayor does NOT have a vote – not even as a tie-breaker as so many erroneously believe. He can veto, but any veto is easily over-ridden by a portion of very ones who passed the vote. So his veto is simply ceremonial.
The mayor conducts the board meetings. He facilitates them. He cannot place anything on the agenda, nor can he move on anything there. He calls the meeting to order and follows the agenda set forth by the Administrator, but the mayor cannot even adjourn the meeting without a board member moving for adjournment. His role is ceremonial.
Oh, BTW... resolutions are, for the most part, ceremonial, too.
Mayor Ray - First Class
Excellent and accurate points RobertM. The whole "get rid of the old guy as Mayor" bit is getting a little silly.
Anyone that knows Ray knows he is first class and cares about the citizens and this city.
Anyone that knows about the job of mayor of FS knows exactly what it is - what Ray does.
The entire argument is construed to get rid of Ray because he has impeded hope and change and prosperity and he is old. Oh yeah, get rid of Ray because I don't want to get involved and help with hope and change and prosperity and making my community better. Yeah, get rid of Ray because I don't want to hold the YEL, Chamber, city administration responsible for their duties, just get rid of Ray. Once we do that, it will never be gloomy again and the streets will be covered with gold. Get real people.
Start getting involved, change what you can control changing, kick out those that aren't progressing this community and back those that are and roll up your sleeves and work for the betterment of this community.
Quit the naysaying, get rid of Ray mentality and focus on what needs to be fixed.
If you think I am off base, talk to me a year from when the new guy gets in office and let me know how that hope and change is working for you.
Nice straw man.
Nice straw man.
Hope?
I don't want hope. I want results.
Ray Baker Master of Ceremonies
Forget the Ceremonies and get down to business. Funerals are also ceremonial.
Pandering?
the race issue only came into play when you left wing crazies made it one. If anyone is pandering it is the libs like you. Go back to the demoncrat hole you came from.
Bact to the hole
That's right, get nasty if you cannot be articulate.
nasty
just using your tried and proven lib socialist tactics.
Articulate Hole
OH!! They know how to articulate hole, their number one in doing that. I mean, they made hole big enough to sink the nation! Bless their little hearts..now they just go around now and say.. no..no..no..
I like little digs such as
I like little digs such as the above titled A hole response. Sorry I mean titled Articulate Hole response.
Could be you like picking any subject just insert bait for argument sake.
I hate to rain on your parade but the nations debt has fault on all sides. If you inherit "such a mess as you claim" you try to correct and fix the mess, not add fuel to the flame so to speak.
President Barack Obama has repeatedly claimed that his budget would cut the deficit by half by the end of his term. But as Heritage analyst Brian Riedl has pointed out, given that Obama has already helped quadruple the deficit with his stimulus package, pledging to halve it by 2013 is hardly ambitious. The Washington Post has a great graphic which helps put President Obama’s budget deficits in context of President Bush’s.
What’s driving Obama’s unprecedented massive deficits? Spending. Riedl details:
* President Bush expanded the federal budget by a historic $700 billion through 2008. President Obama would add another $1 trillion.
* President Bush began a string of expensive financial bailouts. President Obama is accelerating that course.
* President Bush created a Medicare drug entitlement that will cost an estimated $800 billion in its first decade. President Obama has proposed a $634 billion down payment on a new government health care fund.
* President Bush increased federal education spending 58 percent faster than inflation. President Obama would double it.
* President Bush became the first President to spend 3 percent of GDP on federal antipoverty programs. President Obama has already increased this spending by 20 percent.
* President Bush tilted the income tax burden more toward upper-income taxpayers. President Obama would continue that trend.
* President Bush presided over a $2.5 trillion increase in the public debt through 2008. Setting aside 2009 (for which Presidents Bush and Obama share responsibility for an additional $2.6 trillion in public debt), President Obama’s budget would add $4.9 trillion in public debt from the beginning of 2010 through 2016.
UPDATE: Many Obama defenders in the comments are claiming that the numbers above do not include spending on Iraq and Afghanistan during the Bush years. They most certainly do. While Bush did fund the wars through emergency supplementals (not the regular budget process), that spending did not simply vanish. It is included in the numbers above. Also, some Obama defenders are claiming the graphic above represents biased Heritage Foundation numbers. While we stand behind the numbers we put out 100%, the numbers, and the graphic itself, above are from the Washington Post.
CLARIFICATION: Of course, this Washington Post graphic does not perfectly delineate budget surpluses and deficits by administration. President Bush took office in January 2001, and therefore played a lead role in crafting the FY 2002-2008 budgets. Presidents Bush and Obama share responsibility for the FY 2009 budget deficit that overlaps their administrations, before President Obama assumes full budgetary responsibility beginning in FY 2010. Overall, President Obama’s budget would add twice as much debt as President Bush over the same number of years.
Comments Closing
We are not closing comments on this yet, but this is a perfect example of why comments get closed. They get WAY off topic, and do not lend anything worthwhile to discussion on the original story. National, partisan rants do not have anything to do with the original story, and dilute the discussion to the point no one wants to read the comments.
We appreciate your comments and your passion. We really appreciate your participation on The City Wire, but we must keep the comments on topic and relevant. I would encourage you to take your unrelated opinions to our blog section.
Ray Baker
I enjoyed reading your commentary. I have often wondered how much is spent each year on those roses and rose petals he buys. Did he put this out for bids? I know I don't buy roses. Is it true that the city pays a full time secretary to send out birthday cards and each person who sends him an email gets a thank you card? Is there a postage budget? Warm fuzzies are nice but when a city is running in the red, roses and birthday cards should be stopped.
Sorry admin, Lets get back
Sorry admin,
Lets get back to trashing our mayor?
Similar to Supreme Court
Just like the Supreme Court, we will have to wait until all the old codgers die-off before we can change anything in government for the city and county in the Fort Smith area. Grin and bear it or get out and raise a ruckus.
Ray Bay knocks the Feds and the State but his city runs deficits and wastes money perhaps more disproportionately than the State or Federal government, not to mention his pervasive racism and fear mongering.
I agree
I agree Mr. Tilley. It's time for Mr. Baker to move over and let a young person take Ft Smith into the 21 century. I watched channel 6 last night and saw the Ft Smith City board in action, and one citizen got up and ask them what they were going to do about the City being $200.500.000.00.
in debt and all they and Mr. Baker could say was ask him to leave.(That Guy was Pissed). So I guess instead of taking care of business Mr. Baker is to concerned with Cox and Lawrence Welk. Old habits die Hard!
Young people are voting with their feet
Young people are just walking away from Fort Smith if not running away as fast as they can. They are taking their collective votes with them. It is just a matter of time that the foolish policies of the RayBay generation will die off and be replaced with a new era of Asian/Hispanic leadership.Sit back and watch the melting pot boil.
There isn't a young person running
Sandy Sanders isn't young. Younger than Ray Baker, but not young. Where are the people in their 40s and 50s who want to make a difference in this city???
age isn't the primary issue
The problem with the mayor isn't his actual age, it's his vision of the future, or complete lack of. You don't have to be 30 to understand the nuaces of the modern world and see things as they are and work towards improvement, as opposed to trying to recreate an idyllic past which never really was.
relish, hold the onions
The prevailing thought at this point in time is that only Sandy Sanders has the name, clout and connections to unseat the mayor who wears his new clothes.
Thank you, Mr. Tilley for trying to be the young boy who points to the lack of wardrobe.
Now consider this, an announced retirement. Respect shown for years and years of blind love for his city. And then, a wide open race for mayor. Who would file to run against Mr. Sanders? I relish the prospects!
Wouldn't change anything
If Sandy Sanders is the only person in town with the name, clout and connections to unseat Ray Baker then no young whippersnapper would be able to beat him either. Sam T. Sicard isn't walking through that door. YEL is more interested in winetastings than actual leadership.
Way off topic
We all can say good or bad about Cox, AT&T and the satellite folks, that is not the topic of Mike's article.
Mayor Baker needs to understand that without access to the rest of the world (through whatever means necessary), Fort Smith will stay in the 1960's.
Mayor needs....
Ray Baker needs to retire once and for all, period. He does not need to understand, just get out of the way with dignity intact before he embarrasses himself further.
Not So Fast
Michael, in your zeal to attack mayor, you misrepresent COX. Okay, I agree the mayor needs to broaden his perspective beyond his age 80+ contingency of voters, but COX is all about money—plain and simple. They load the lower channels (their cheapest tier) with only what is required by FCC and the channels they make good money on like HSN. They move all desired channels to paying tiers to increase subscriber fees and programming kickbacks. Would it hurt COX to offer the church programs or a local news channel on lower band? NO! They blackout KTHV for 80% of time (that black still uses bandwidth) they could easily insert local programming instead of black. COX screams bandwidth issues as a smokescreen for their business model to squeeze as much as they can from sub fees, advertisers and vendors. Hey, that’s capitalism and that’s what American corporations do, but let’s call it what it is and not make COX out to be nice guys. The mayor may not have correct perspective, but neither does COX. I hope AT&T does a better job, but doubtful.
Let the games begin
Competition? I live on 6th street with no Uverse, no ATT high speed DSL available, no competition for Cox.
I love my Cox service, and i
I love my Cox service, and i agree Mr. Tilley moving into more digital service is critical. But i dislike the fact my bill keeps going up. It went up $4 or $5 bucks last month for no reason. When you analyze the bill you realize you are paying all kinds of fees (around $20 in taxes for me), just seems the costs keep going up and up. Eventually the old saying "we are upgrading our equipment with new lines and such" isnt going to work.
It costs what it costs.
I dropped all of my Cox services except internet which also went up. I am currently searching for alternatives as I resent monopolistic price gouging.
COMMENTS CLOSED!!!
As did I
I now have AT&T internet and DirecTV satellite.. much cheaper than Cox. However, that's not the point of the article.
The point is......La punta es.........
Replace the old with the new.
Do you mean Tilley's new
Do you mean Tilley's new headline?
Mayor
I dislike dumping on an old man,but somebody take him aside and enlighten him, please!!
One of his latest is his declaration of war on gangs, drugs and illegal immigrants.
Old time fear mongering is all it is. The war started decades ago, where has he been....in church I guess? The police deserve credit,the mayor cannot co-opt this one.
Enough is enough. Let him keep prosyletising the "way we were". When outsiders observe that Fort Smith citizens have finally voted him out along with his superficial pep rally style perhaps then we will change to be a serious contender with the global competitors,at least in Arkansas,...maybe!
I hope that he resolution is
I hope that he resolution is meaningless as the article suggest because I believe it is similar to an Ostrich sticking his head in the sand. I am certain that a resolution similar to this was not passed in Northwest Arkansas or in Conway where Hewlett Packard built their new facility since HP stated that Conway is similar to the Silicon Valley.
Nuff Said
CLOSE COMMENT
Agreed
Double standard written all over it. If 'anonymous' criticizes the status quo he/she gets comments closed by admin.
So.............It is Mike's turn. Shut him up or down..fair is fair!!
If you don't like it ....
........use another blog or start your own. Censorship is arbitrary any way.
Kudos Mr. Tilley. We don't
Kudos Mr. Tilley. We don't always see eye-to-eye, but you hit the mark on this piece.