Director Merry open to trash rate increase

story by Aric Mitchell
amitchell@thecitywire.com

Fort Smith Director Philip Merry is ready to look at rate increases for the non-automated solid waste collection areas of Fort Smith. His open door to a rate increase comes after a June 5 meeting when Merry assured Fort Smith residents there would be no increase.

“Concerning a rate increase — this goes up, that goes up — nothing goes up unless the people on this board vote for it, and that isn’t going to happen, not in this current configuration,” Merry said during the June 5 Board of Directors meeting.

On Wednesday (June 20), Merry told The City Wire, “We (the board) are ... wanting to redirect the financial pressure to the non-automated homes so that the automated homes could realize benefits of the added efficiency.”

The shift occurred after Merry said he had “missed a very key document” at the May 29 study session of the Fort Smith Board of Directors when he motioned to end automated conversions for all of the remaining 20 neighborhoods (also classified as 21 neighborhoods when adding in non-designated portions of the city).

Merry said he was under the impression “it was an all or nothing thing” — an answer first stated on Tuesday by City Director Pam Weber, who also voted with Merry to end the conversions.

If that was the impression May 29, then why had that impression changed on June 19 when Merry motioned (seconded by Weber) to bring back seven neighborhoods into the automated conversion plan?

“As you (The City Wire) and everyone else are very aware, I made an apology last night (June 19), and it was because that I didn’t see it, grasp it and do it earlier. I do know how to read. I’m a college graduate. I just didn’t see that. I wish I had seen it and been a tiger by the tail at that time. But once you know you should have done it earlier, is that a reason you never do it ever? I’m not the cover-up type. I’ve got to sleep at night.”

Merry apologized again for “not having a better understanding” of the citizen survey results document from the May 29 study session.

“There were seven (neighborhoods) that wanted it, voting for automation, and never was it my intent to not let them have it,” he explained.

Merry revealed that prior to the Tuesday night (June 19) board meeting, he had asked Baridi Nkokheli, director of the Fort Smith Department of Sanitation, to look at “recalculating rate differentials” for areas of Fort Smith under automated and non-automated collection services. Nkokheli is expected to deliver his recalculations on Friday (June 22).

“If he were to come back up and say he could make the numbers work with no rate increase at all (to either service), I’d still want him to go back and figure another rate increase (to non-automated) so that you can then give automated this theory of a rate decrease.”

Merry continued: “I told him (Nkokheli) my hope would be he could come out with some rate differential for (the non-automated) neighborhoods and make it not be that painful (as in a previously quoted figure of $10.18 per month).”

“Here’s the math,” Merry said. “I’ve asked (City Administrator) Ray (Gosack) to give us a firm rate on the price differential. Three weeks ago, he came up with an arbitrary ten bucks, and I told him, ‘Ray, even numbers always make me wonder. Now I know when you do rate studies, you always guess high. Is it reasonable to say in the end that it’s not really a $10 difference (between automated and non-automated)? If in addition to that lower number, we take these seven locations that clearly wanted automated, wouldn’t that make the number charged come down even more?’”

City Director and Vice Mayor Kevin Settle believes the choice is to not have a dual collection system.

“Automation for the city is the right thing to do. Ultimately that is the goal,” Settle said. “Maybe we should automate the whole city and not have these discussions about two different systems.”

If a higher rate is proposed for non-automated collection, Settle says residents in those areas should be consulted before the Board approves a “hybrid” system of trash collection.

“The citizens of those areas should have an opinion on that,” Settle said.

Advertisement:

To the current petition efforts of Fort Smith citizen Joel Culberson to move the entire city to automated collection, Merry said, “In the end, if Joel's petition does occur, and voters choose to vote out a compromise — well, let’s allow the compromise do its thing, and if people don’t like that, they will vote against it. But please don’t freeze everything. There is work to be done here in the interim.”

But what if residential customers receiving the non-automated service don’t wish to pay a rate increase?

“Now they’ve been given a choice, and at that point, I can vote automated, because now they’re denying the compromise. We’re down to the last parts, and it will naturally take care of itself in one to two years, but compromise and working with people in the interim is important,” Merry said.

Five Star Votes: 
Average: 3.4 (9 votes)

Comments

how convoluted

just so I have this straight in my head. The guy who overlooked the survey results but made a motion anyway, the guy who swore no increase would happen, the guy who apologized but still didn't take the time to fully analyze the document he overlooked, now, a day later, the guy is still trying to get in front of this mess and pretend its a parade and he's got the grand baton in his hand. Please. stop. Leave the sanitation department to the sanitation department. What is next in this Punch and Judy show?!! And just so you know, it hasn't gone unnoticed that your co-horts in all this mess are stone cold quiet.

Merry's comments

Merry has twisted himself in so many circles on this deal, it's difficult understand half of what is written in this article. Phil quit trying to be an appeaser and finally just do what is right.

Better to keep mouth shut and have people wonder..

..than to open and have them know for sure. While it's good that he can read and has a college education, Mr Merry seems to repeatedly slam headfirst into obstacles in his quest to provide non 'cookie cutter' style individualized trash service to an entire city where each and every neighborhood, like snowflakes, consists of very different human beings. There's little doubt he will not eventually ascertain the two sets of charges which do not appear to matter in the least anymore.

To pay or not to pay, that is the question

To pay higher rates for non-automated service or not to pay for service that you have the option of cancelling is the honest question. By me not using trash collecdtion services from the Sanitation department I save the City the cost of stopping at my residence and picking up my trash.....Fair enough compromise. To have or not have service rather than being forced by a monopoly to pay for something that in my condition I will never be able to use are the questions. The "old"residences which don't physically fit into the "new" technology should not be forced to unreasonably adapt to the change. When automated supporters sentiment displays a "to hell with everybody else" attitude, then compromise is out the window. Let me shut the window then and worry about my own trash disposal while not paying for everybody else's, thank you.

Question to To pay or not to pay, that is the question

Question? I don't want the city's police or fire protection so I should have the option to opt out and save on my taxes correct?

anonymous To pay or not to pay, that is the question

I have a question about cancelling your trash service. I don't have children in the public school system so do I have the right not to pay real estate taxes to support the schools? The answer if you don't know is NO.

Opting out isn't an option

As a very valid public policy, the city isn't going to allow people to just willy nilly opt out on sanitation services on an individual basis (or neighborhood basis for that matter). Society as a whole benefits from the safe and sanitary disposal of waste products and they take measures to ensure that we have that. Especially in a close city environment. Basically no one wants the black plague to start emanating from Park Hill. So this opt out, monopoly, etc argument is lame and nonsensical.

Majority Bully Plague

What is lame and nonsensical is your shallow rationale. I can dispose of trash in a safe and sanitary way without the using and paying for the City Sanitation trash collection from my home. And it is not "will nilly" as you condescendingly describe. The "willy-nilly" , nickel and dime coercion by the city at every turn is not a "valid public policy" since you brought up that subject.

OMG...Director Merry, please stop digging

Director has to stop digging himself further in the hole he has created. Admitting you did not read or notice all of the documents, abruptly change your mind and then make a fool of yourself has been reserved thus far for Director Weber. I guess they are close friends so they can bond on this. Please stop, take a deep breath and start fresh. You are taking, what started as a stellar reputation and killing it being a Director. Please stop.

Dizzying Spin

This nonsense is nothing more than deflection from the fact that Director Merry is the one who proposed the "all or none" ordinance. He did so, apparently, after the "except one" ordinance for Park Hill East. He did so, apparently, after having reviewed his study session packet. He did so, apparently, after being questioned by Director Settle "just 13 or all 20?" The "overlooked document" apology was packaged as somehow a willingness to compromise and now the compromise is being packaged as an invitation to a tierd purchase plan. Adding complexity only adds cost. This is another bad start. Instead, start with an apology to Baridi Nkokheli and finish with an apology to the citizens for not doing your homework before making motions. Follow that by a pledge to not have to "win at all costs" and to stop micromanaging. I agree with the commentor who mentioned your commitment and experience to community is being tarnished by an inablity and inexperience to legislate.

Needing a better understanding

You have me confused again, Phil. At the board meeting, you said you "overlooked a very key document" Yet, you tell the City Wire, it's a matter of “not having a better understanding” of the document. You keep referring to backing away from the third party option as "a compromise." Yet, the compromise is actually not forcing neighborhoods who never voted for manual service into the manual pool. That's not a compromise, that's covering your mistake.

the overlooked document

need we remind Director Merry that his "overlooked document" cost the city $12,767 to prepare for him.