Seven-year itch

Riff Raff, by Michael Tilley
mtilley@thecitywire.com

In 2005, just two years after Whirlpool gave us a clear hint about the future of its Fort Smith manufacturing operations, business and community leaders in the Fort Smith region had a chance to undertake an aggressive, progressive and risky — in terms of being a new approach — plan to change regional socio-economic realities.

The TIP plan was the product of an impressive $4 million capital campaign conducted by the Fort Smith Regional Chamber of Commerce. The plan was named after Austin, Texas-based TIP Strategies, the company that conducted research on the regional economy and authored the “Tipping Point” plan.

“No amount of industry recruitment, regardless of how intense or persistent, would yield economic success,” the TIP plan noted of the region’s economic outlook.

It also noted that a successful socio-economic development strategy is one that “stretches the boundaries of what constitutes economic action,” and that “recommendations that are at the core of this plan go well beyond a traditional framework.”

The TIP plan strongly suggested that regional business and civic leaders place themselves in “crisis” mode and act accordingly.

“In short, Fort Smith must do two things,” noted the key paragraph in the TIP Plan. “It must see itself as facing an impending crisis. And, secondly, it must make the kind of long term commitments that — however painfully — pull it away from the brink.”

For a variety of reasons we won’t now discuss, the chamber leadership failed to execute what was a good game plan. Our leadership at that time failed to take smart and aggressive risks that would have stretched the “boundaries of what constitutes economic action.” The chamber, city of Fort Smith, University of Arkansas at Fort Smith and other entities pulled back into their respective shells. It was clear that our leaders were sustainers rather than builders.

And what have they sustained? Well, we had roughly 6,000 people unemployed in the region at the end of 2005, and around 129,000 people with jobs. As of May 2012, there were about 9,900 people without jobs, and about 119,000 people employed in the region. Also, Whirlpool officially closed its Fort Smith plant on Friday (June 29).

We have successfully sustained a downward trend.

The TIP plan strongly advised that we create fertile ground for local entrepreneurs. We didn’t do that. We’ve failed to reach out with innovative and aggressive plans to recruit entrepreneurs from other U.S. research universities — even the university research programs just a few miles up the hill in Fayetteville.

The TIP plan strongly advised we create unique cultural amenity opportunities that help retain the best and brightest brains in the region. We didn’t do that — and, no, water parks, ball fields and Ferris Wheels don’t qualify.

The TIP plan strongly advised we do more to “capture outward expansion from Northwest Arkansas.” We didn’t do that. In fact, when we had that chance, we failed to act. Duralor is now in Springdale with its growing advanced manufacturing operation.

In 2005, the TIP plan noted: “Located in the heart of the Arkansas River Valley, the greater Fort Smith area faces a number of challenges common to manufacturing dependent communities: relatively low levels of educational attainment, out-migration from the urban core, an under-performing downtown, and the ever-looming threat of layoffs and plant closings.”

The conclusion holds true today — especially with Trane and Rheem likely to go the way of Whirlpool.

In 2005, the TIP plan noted: “Early in the course of this project it became clear that there were systemic issues facing the River Valley, issues that both compromised the ability to recruit new industry and that threw a stark light on economic vitality.”

The conclusion holds true today.

Advertisement:

What also holds true today are many of the solutions presented in the TIP plan. It could be that the TIP plan is a don’t-have-to-reinvent-the-wheel benefit to the newly formed Fort Smith Regional Council. The council, formed by the Fort Smith Regional Chamber of Commerce, is a group of area business leaders who seek to emulate the success of the Northwest Arkansas Council and Fifty for the Future, a group formed in 1963 in Little Rock.

Before more dust collects on the machinery of the Fort Smith regional economy, maybe the council dusts off the TIP plan and attempts to stretch “the boundaries of what constitutes economic action. Maybe they use the TIP recommendations to “go well beyond a traditional framework” of socio-economic development and prove they are indeed builders rather than sustainers.

As I’ve noted many times, we are a great people, in a great place, who are capable of great progress. Seven years ago we came close to connecting a great plan with great leadership. Am not sure we can afford a disconnect on another seven years.

Five Star Votes: 
Average: 4.6 (9 votes)

Like This Article? Share It!

Comments

How and What?

I recall the TIP plan quite well. What I carried away from it was that we had to develop a place where the young professional would want to live as he/she can live anywhere they want to. This they referred to as quality of place. An element of this certainly is waterparks, walking trails, ballfields and yes a Ferris Wheel. It is certainly true that industry recruitment is not the answer as manufacturing in the old sense is no longer viable. The other phrases in the piece are confusing. "Stretch boundries of what constitutes economic action". "Beyond traditional". "Painful long term commitment". What does all of this mean? I do understand that our leaders are sustainers and not builders or visionaries. I have yet to see anyone with a clue about building for the future. The question should be "What do we want to be?". You mention making it a fertile ground for entrepreneurs. OK. How? Cut taxes and do away with regulation? Sounds like the tea party and makes little sense if you want to have a real quality of place. You must pay for it. "Reach out to research universities?" OK. That makes sense...how and how not to step on the toes of our teaching university? A political reality for sure. Then there is "Unique cultural amenities, waterparks and ballfields don't qualify". We have a couple and one on the way. The National Historic Site, the Bass Reeves Statue and the planned Marshals Museum are unique and cultural. Our symphony is certainly unique for a city of our size as well. But what type of unique cultural amenities could we have. Alice don't live here and Crystal Bridges isn't either. That certainly is unique and we don't have a Presidential library. I believe we can only capture outward expansion from NWA by offering the quality of place that they can have 75 miles away. Our low education level is a result of the out migration and lack of opportunity that is here. Without the infastructure we are screwed. Then there is the 400 pound gorilla in the room. Politics. We are condemned to talk about trash cans and stray animals and not having a vision for the future. We spend over 3 years talking about the convention center, one of the amenities we do have, and eventually turn down adequate financing through a 1% food tax because of local politics. This is disgusting. My conclusion is that the people of Fort Smith, at least those who vote, don't want any change much less a long term painful commitment, beyond traditional. Maybe a good leader could come forward and do a selling job and convince people that we could and should do it but our history says otherwise. As long as our "leaders" are concerned about trash cans that is where our future lies.
I recall the TIP plan quite well. What I carried away from it was that we had to develop a place where the young professional would want to live as he/she can live anywhere they want to. This they referred to as quality of place. An element of this certainly is waterparks, walking trails, ballfields and yes a Ferris Wheel. It is certainly true that industry recruitment is not the answer as manufacturing in the old sense is no longer viable. The other phrases in the piece are confusing. "Stretch boundries of what constitutes economic action". "Beyond traditional". "Painful long term commitment". What does all of this mean? I do understand that our ...>> Read the entire comment.

"planned" Marshall Musuem

It's been planned for years. No movement until they thought their great free money idea of the commemerative coin wasn't going to happen, then they STARTED to fundraise locally. When's the state drive starting? the national? Yeah, your guess is as good as mine. Old guard wants to stay in power and control of decisions no matter the cost to the region. Until they start getting innovative like Bentonville is, nothing is going to change here. We'll still be arguing over trash in five years.

Lack of knowledge is showing

Anon, your lack of knowledge is showing but it is understandable. Fund raising is not something that is in the public eye. I assure you there has been a continuous and and dedicated effort in this regard. There are plenty of stops and starts along the way. This is a marathon and not a dash. And for your information, genius, Marshal as in US Marshals Service is spelled with one L not two.

Frustrating

The actors at city hall and the chamber keep changing, but the general processes and thinking are more or less the same. The city distracts itself with feuds over police chiefs and administrators, trash cans and convention centers. The chamber, well, nobody seems to know precisely what they are doing. UAFS seems to be off in its own world now. Committees, alliances and studies come and go. We still chase after low skill manufacturing like it is 1950, which sounds about as crazy as if Pittsburgh were to go on a recruiting binge for steel mills or Pine Bluff looked to revive their economy by scoring agricultural jobs. The area needs an identity or niche other than low-skill jobs, but it won't happen as long as we're all distracted by feuds and going it alone.
The actors at city hall and the chamber keep changing, but the general processes and thinking are more or less the same. The city distracts itself with feuds over police chiefs and administrators, trash cans and convention centers. The chamber, well, nobody seems to know precisely what they are doing. UAFS seems to be off in its own world now. Committees, alliances and studies come and go. We still chase after low skill manufacturing like it is 1950, which sounds about as crazy as if Pittsburgh were to go on a recruiting binge for steel mills or Pine Bluff looked to revive their economy by scoring agricultural jobs. The area needs an identity or niche other than ...>> Read the entire comment.

Aerospace?

I see yet another aerospace manufacturer has moved into the region. This time it is a Belgian company investing in Stillwater, Oklahoma. Tulsa already has a big aerospace presence led by American Airlines, as does Wichita with Spirit AeroSystems among several others. Those two cities are leaders in the industry. Oklahoma City has plentiful military aerospace jobs via Tinker AFB. The government is also doing drone research at Fort Sill near Lawton. Little Rock has Dassault Falcon and Hawker Beechcraft. There was a recent story in the Dem-Gazette that XNA missed out on a Bombardier facility in 2004 due to poor airport accessibility. These are high-skill, higher wage jobs. What would it take to get Fort Smith into the game? Improvements at our underutilized airport? Incentives? Anybody know? Instead of being a base for unmanned drones, we should be the city to manufacture the drones. http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?subjectid=11&articleid=20120710_11_A1_CUTLIN838064#
I see yet another aerospace manufacturer has moved into the region. This time it is a Belgian company investing in Stillwater, Oklahoma. Tulsa already has a big aerospace presence led by American Airlines, as does Wichita with Spirit AeroSystems among several others. Those two cities are leaders in the industry. Oklahoma City has plentiful military aerospace jobs via Tinker AFB. The government is also doing drone research at Fort Sill near Lawton. Little Rock has Dassault Falcon and Hawker Beechcraft. There was a recent story in the Dem-Gazette that XNA missed out on a Bombardier facility in 2004 due to poor airport accessibility. These are high-skill, higher wage ...>> Read the entire comment.

What it takes

With a runway long enough for C5 jumbo cargo jets,why is this asset underutilized? The leadership in Fort Smith is lacking, period. You could hand over enough taxpayer cash to build an Area 52 in Fort Smith with a rocket port and it would still fail.....Oh wait....been there done that...CC, Mitsubishi,....etc.,. Throw the bums out and issue restraining orders for each of them to stay 1000 feet away from any lemonade stand.