An unfortunate review

Riff Raff, by Michael Tilley
mtilley@thecitywire.com

What follows is an abridged and heavily amended version of a Riff Raff essay first published in June 2009. Although more than two years old, many points in the essay, unfortunately, remain relevant.

Here we go. And let’s begin with a question posited in that June 2009 essay: “What now? As a region, as a people and as a collection of cities, What-Fricking-Now? What are the collective goals of the region? What do we all want to be when 2020 rolls around? What!?”

There are a wide range of intriguing and doable possibilities. Conversations with concerned citizens and Kind Readers (often one in the same) in the past 15-plus years have resulted in the compilation of too many good ideas to list here. Also, we know that our region of 300,000 folks is limited in its resources (and political will) to engage at one time a long and broad To-Do list. With that in mind, let’s briefly consider a few options possessing the potential of transformative socio-economic change in our metro area.

THREE OPTIONS FOR TRANSFORMATIVE CHANGE
Small business development

The University of Arkansas at Fort Smith has proactively revamped its small business support structure to provide “an information-rich environment for start-up businesses, potential entrepreneurs, existing companies and family-owned enterprises and collect, analyze and disseminate information related to local and regional entrepreneurial, economic and business activities.”

However, the one thing we aren’t doing well as a region is aggressively pursuing teams of individuals who take their business ideas to national entrepreneurial competitions and/or matriculate out of incubator organizations at hundreds of universities around the country. The business college has become nothing more than a boring reproduction of hundreds of business colleges around the nation.

That’s unfortunate, and shame on us if our regional economic development officials won’t better support local entrepreneurial upstarts and formulate a proactive plan that let’s the tens of thousands of brilliant entrepreneurial minds around the country know that we welcome their ideas to our fertile grounds.

If the world’s largest retailer and the world’s largest meat company could find success in out-of-the-way small Arkansas towns, then please don’t tell me the Fort Smith region is incapable of supporting a wide range of new business ideas. Please keep your defeatism to yourself.

Tourism/sports venue growth

Sure, we’ve got the Marshals Museum on the hook, but it could be 10 years or more before the first tourist buys an overpriced plastic badge (made in China) in the museum’s gift shop.

Look, folks, we’ve got to quit kidding ourselves and get serious about bringing in thousands more folks a year who spend money in our stores, restaurants and hotels. We must demand that city of Fort Smith and Sebastian County officials remove their gray matter from their dark places and get serious about building a city/county sports complex at Ben Geren park that would rank within the top 20 among the nation’s 363 U.S. metro areas. We Fort Smithians also must demand that city officials bring some sanity into our tourism efforts by combining our tourism recruitment with our convention center management — as is done in most cities enjoying success.

(OK. We’ve done some of this since 2009. But a water park and a few ball fields is a small step in what should/could have been an aggressive long-term plan. We need to do more to physically tie the Fort Smith Museum of History, Fort Smith trolley system, downtown Fort Smith and the riverfront area, the National Historic Site and the Marshals Museum into an “historic campus” that includes infotainment opportunities for a wide range of ages and interests. We should do more to to invest in walkways, bike paths, riverfront expansion, and other park and beautification amenities. And the investment should come with more public input rather than a few ideas from city officials and a parks commission.)

Regional council

The Fort Smith region could use a well-financed business-sponsored “council” focused on big picture improvements and/or lobbying.

This is not a suggestion to create and/or restore the Good Old Boys network. The bottom line is that we could use a small staff supported exclusively with private-sector funds. The Fort Smith Regional Chamber of Commerce has announced such a council, but they’ve given no hints about if it will truly be a leadership group able to propose and push bold and transformative ideas. Anything less than such a leadership group will be yet another false start from the chamber.

Financial support from our regional council would come from businesses and individuals interested in SIGNIFICANTLY better connections in Little Rock and Washington, D.C., securing CONSISTENT and PROFESSIONAL efforts to obtain Interstate 49 funding, and interested in pressuring municipal and county governments to be PROACTIVE in regional infrastructure enhancements (water supplies, intermodal operations, parks and recreation, maximizing Fort Chaffee development, etc.).

And please know that better connections to Little Rock means this proposed council would actively seek out Arkansas Legislative candidates more interested in progress than liberal and conservative political agendas. Left-wing tree huggers and right-wing bible thumpers won’t get us a seat on the Highway Commission; won’t get us more funding for UAFS; won’t obtain leadership positions in the Arkansas Legislature; won’t give us a voice in state agencies that oversee important aspects of state government; won’t do anything but continue to prove that narrow political agendas are the offspring of small minds that use unproven science and untestable scripture to obstruct the practice of proactive, results-oriented politics.

OTHER IDEAS
This essay is too long, so let’s simply list other ideas, including those suggested by Kind Readers.
• Aggressive beautification campaign that might include an attempt to bury utilities.

• Regional healthcare coalition that might financially benefit doctors, hospitals, clinics, businesses and patients. Especially patients.

• Reformation of county government.

• Get serious about recruiting movie production to western Arkansas.

• Get serious about investing in the restoration of the Belle Grove Historic District.

• Develop an innovative model to reform public education and test it in Fort Smith.

You’re right, if not constructive, to caution that the devil is in the details with respect to all this talk about transformative change. But might we consider that if we fear the devilish details we’ll have economic and cultural hell to pay if we allow a fear of transformative change to diminish our ability to make the most of our opportunities.

Please forgive the repetition of a statement previously issued in this space, but it seems a addition to this rambling essay: What’s wrong with the Fort Smith regional economy is no match for what’s right with the Fort Smith area. Within our people and within our many public and private entities, we have the potential for great things; we have the potential — through better leadership — to direct overwhelming people-power on whatever problems and obstacles we face. We are a great people, in a great place, and we are capable of great progress.

Advertisement:

However, don’t be surprised if we see this essay again in another two years. The Fort Smith Board of Director is a political body with the ability to impact — through secondary effects of direct action — socio-economic development beyond city borders. But a majority of the Board is focused on micromanaging and win-it-all-costs petty politics. Collectively, this Board majors in the minors.

Our business leadership has been unable to coalesce into a meaningful force that has any leverage to enact significant positive change — which is funny, considering that many folks believe a Good Old Boys network is calling the shots and keeping Fort Smith mired in the the 1960s.

In their book, The Axemaker’s Gift, James Burke and Robert Ornstein told us that things (plants, animals, people, cultures, communities, etc.) “go the way of anything in nature that stands still or doesn’t adapt: they die.”

We’ve become less well since 2009.

Five Star Votes: 
Average: 4.3 (12 votes)

Like This Article? Share It!

Comments

Here we go again

Yes, MT, the more things change the more they stay the same. The faces change but little else does. I had high hopes for Merry and Weber, but alas, they continue the waltz to oblivion. Trash cans, pet regulations, paranoia, and no vision. That sums up Fort Smith. No leadership for sure. No ability to same no; we have more important things to do than to enter into an endless discussion over trivia. For God Sakes make a decision and move on. A friend of mine posted on Facebook this weekend that he took a trip to Fayetteville. To him the vitality there was refreshing. It is attitude and Fort Smith has a bad one. Look at our legislative delegation, our city board and other governing bodies. They are a reflection of us. If we don't want to be known as what they represent then let's change. But stop the whinning about Whirlpool etc. and get an idea of our possibilities and move on.
Yes, MT, the more things change the more they stay the same. The faces change but little else does. I had high hopes for Merry and Weber, but alas, they continue the waltz to oblivion. Trash cans, pet regulations, paranoia, and no vision. That sums up Fort Smith. No leadership for sure. No ability to same no; we have more important things to do than to enter into an endless discussion over trivia. For God Sakes make a decision and move on. A friend of mine posted on Facebook this weekend that he took a trip to Fayetteville. To him the vitality there was refreshing. It is attitude and Fort Smith has a bad one. Look at our legislative delegation, our city ...>> Read the entire comment.

I think those in charge are

I think those in charge are afraid of change. They don't want to lose their grip on power, so they go to great lengths to preserve that power. I moved here 10 years ago looking for a new start. All I've seen is stagnation (and new traffic signals)

Those in charge or the voters?

I'd take it a step back and point out the obvious: those in charge are a reflection of the will of the voters. In this region, there remain a large number of voters who desparately want to maintain the status quo, or return to some idyllic Mayberry - Andy Griffith past that may or may not have ever actually existed. Too many people are living in perpetual nostalgia while places like NW Arkansas dream and plan for the future. This is why we have backward looking folks like Altes, Holland, etc representing us in Little Rock instead of Pitsch, Green or some other qualified candidate. In Fort Smith proper, reality has slowly sunk in that there is no such thing as status quo, or just as Tilley said: you're either livin' or dyin'. Over the last couple of decades, voters have shown a willingness to pass a variety of community/economic improvement projects. More recently, voters began electing BOD candidates running on pro-growth, quality of place platforms. I'd trace the BOD trend back to 2004 when Velvet Medlock beat do-nothing Nan Bartlett and we started to see more neighborhood coalition involvement with the city. The problem is, just like Merry and Weber now, Medlock inexplicably went off the rails once in power and quickly went down in flames. The trick now is to find candidates with pro-growth convictions and enough self-restraint to avoid arrogance and micromanaging power trips. We have the vision, the roadmap (TIP), now we need real leaders.
I'd take it a step back and point out the obvious: those in charge are a reflection of the will of the voters. In this region, there remain a large number of voters who desparately want to maintain the status quo, or return to some idyllic Mayberry - Andy Griffith past that may or may not have ever actually existed. Too many people are living in perpetual nostalgia while places like NW Arkansas dream and plan for the future. This is why we have backward looking folks like Altes, Holland, etc representing us in Little Rock instead of Pitsch, Green or some other qualified candidate. In Fort Smith proper, reality has slowly sunk in that there is no such thing as status ...>> Read the entire comment.

Decisions

Observer, you asked Merry & Webber to make decisions and move on. You also claimed they had no vision. You must not remember the past. The board voted in favor of the food tax, and it was overturned (thsi was a forward thing tax). The board already passed the trash issue as well and now Mr Culberson is leading a petition to sen this to the voters as well. Whya re we asking them to make decisions and then turnign about right after they do this and trying to overturn what they did? If we elected them to make these decisions, then after they're made we need to move on. We live in a society where if we're umpleased with the leader then we replace them.

The thing with decision making...

is you have to remain consistent. Yes, the board passed the trash issue, YEARS AGO, it was only recently that the board got barraged with this fiasco and Merry and Weber and Catsavis et al demanded surveys be taken till they got the answers they wanted and then made a decision that harmed the rest of the city and undermined the decisions made years ago. So therefore, Culberson is basically trying to correct their positions to reflect what the people want. As to replacement, sadly enough, we can't replace Merry and Weber fast enough. Until then though they are going to do as much damage as possible. Same thing with Tyler, he is out and this is his parting shot to try to take folks with him.
is you have to remain consistent. Yes, the board passed the trash issue, YEARS AGO, it was only recently that the board got barraged with this fiasco and Merry and Weber and Catsavis et al demanded surveys be taken till they got the answers they wanted and then made a decision that harmed the rest of the city and undermined the decisions made years ago. So therefore, Culberson is basically trying to correct their positions to reflect what the people want. As to replacement, sadly enough, we can't replace Merry and Weber fast enough. Until then though they are going to do as much damage as possible. Same thing with Tyler, he is out and this is his parting shot to try ...>> Read the entire comment.

Since when Did City Go By Surveys?

Number Six, since when did the city administration start going by surveys. Over 70% of the residents were happy with their sanitation arrangement 3 years ago, but the city administration still forced city sanitation onto the residents. That isn’t how you build trust. Culberson is basically trying to cover for the city by giving the citizens a pittance of options. This petition drive to determine if the city should provide “all manual” or “all automatic” is a ridiculous option when the ballot should have been whether the residents of FS wanted city sanitation or competitive bidding by 3rd party companies. That would have kept prices while providing good service.
Number Six, since when did the city administration start going by surveys. Over 70% of the residents were happy with their sanitation arrangement 3 years ago, but the city administration still forced city sanitation onto the residents. That isn’t how you build trust. Culberson is basically trying to cover for the city by giving the citizens a pittance of options. This petition drive to determine if the city should provide “all manual” or “all automatic” is a ridiculous option when the ballot should have been whether the residents of FS wanted city sanitation or competitive bidding by 3rd party companies. That would have kept prices while providing ...>> Read the entire comment.

Options

Yes, Jack, it's ridiculous that time has to be spent to conduct a petition effort, it should have been swiftly implemented by the board as laid out in 2006 and reaffirmed in 2009. There is NO need for third-party competitive bidding-- I dare you find a third-party provider who can provide the same service levels (trash, yard waste, recycling, dial-a-truck, citywide cleanup, no-cost services to local non-profits, etc.) for the rates paid in Fort Smith. And, before you type it, no, Jonesboro, and their 1/2% sales tax where the service is "FREE" doesn't count. Furthermore, the ballot initiative process is codified in our state and local laws. You are free to start your own petition for third-party competitive bidding if you so choose and spend time collecting signatures. Until then, please refrain from ridiculing someone else's efforts and explaining what "should have" been done.

Sometimes decisions are wrong

BCM, I applauded them when they voted on the PFT. A decision that should have been made 2 years before but the previous board dithered and slowed it to fester and become emotional and firing an administrator in the meantime. Make decisions. That is their job! Do the job and I will respect them. Dither and play to the crowd? No respect .