$0

Riff Raff, by Michael Tilley
mtilley@thecitywire.com

The assignment of $1.54 billion in special highway project funding contained within a road tax plan on the Nov. 6 election ballot includes $648 million for the central Arkansas area, $375 million for Northwest Arkansas and $0 for the Fort Smith metro area.

There is perhaps no clearer indication of the lack of political influence from the Fort Smith metro area than the “$0” allocation. The state’s third-largest metro area containing the state’s second largest city receives $0 in special highway project funds.

This reality began when the Arkansas Legislature in 2011 approved voter consideration of a Constitutional amendment that would issue up to $1.3 billion in bonds financed by a half-cent increase in the state sales tax. Using existing revenue, the plan would spend $1.8 billion in four-lane project improvements around the state.

It should be noted that passage of the tax plan is anything but certain. A recent Talk Business-Hendrix College Poll found the plan with 49.5% against the increase, and 42% who would vote for it. The figures were little changed from a March 26 poll that showed 50.5% against the plan.

How is that the Fort Smith metro area was handed $0? There are many reasons, but – at risk of oversimplification – one must consider the almost two decades of area citizens sending legislators to Little Rock based more on church affiliation than political ability. Also, an inability or unwillingness by Fort Smith regional leaders to be more proactively engaged with Arkansas’ political machine has resulted in this region not having an Arkansas Highway Commissioner. No commissioner, no seat at the money table. $0

Fort Smith Mayor Sandy Sanders, Fort Chaffee Redevelopment Authority Director Ivy Owen and other regional leaders are attempting to put a happy face on $0. They will do this using two arguments.

First, they want area residents to believe that city and county sharing of a voter-approved road tax plan will bring an estimated $26.36 million to Sebastian County and its cities, and an estimated $11.74 million to Crawford County and its cities. They will urge area residents to vote for the plan because this is money that will not come to the region if the plan fails. Don’t be surprised when they suggest that voter approval of the plan will bring more than $55.6 million to the region (Crawford, Franklin, Logan, Scott and Sebastian counties) in tax-revenue turnback money.

The second tactic has Fort Smith metro leaders distracting area residents from the $0 embarrassment by suggesting that more than $51 million in federal stimulus dollar have been sent to area road projects in recent years – primarily for Interstate 49 work through Chaffee Crossing.

Both of these points are disingenuous, if not insulting.

All counties will receive tax-revenue turnback money if the road tax is approved. All things being equal, the road tax plan will provide $648 million for the central Arkansas area, $375 million for Northwest Arkansas and $0 for the Fort Smith metro area.

As to the stimulus dollars, yes, we did get a nice lump of funding for I-49 work through Chaffee Crossing. But a simple review of state transportation funding in the past few years — to include the millions for interstate widening between Conway and Little Rock and U.S. 412 work in Northwest Arkansas — clearly shows that the extra I-49 funding at best created an equal funding stream with other regions. Again, all things being equal, the road tax plan will provide $648 million for the central Arkansas area, $375 million for Northwest Arkansas and $0 for the Fort Smith metro area.

This in no way should read as critical of the special project funding directed toward central Arkansas and Northwest Arkansas. Their ability to be politically positioned for the funding advantage is a credit to the collaborative ability of their respective business and civic leaders.

Business and civic leaders in the Fort Smith metro area have to put a happy face on receiving $0 in special project funds. But they are in a box. To support the plan requires them with a straight face to explain to Fort Smith area residents that receiving $0 out of $1.54 billion in special project funding is somehow a good thing. And if they don’t publicly support the plan, they run a great risk of further — if that is possible — distancing themselves from the table of political influence.

I don't envy the position of Fort Smith area leaders, nor do I have a solution for their political pickle. Truth be told, if in their shoes I’d probably do the same grin-and-bear-it routine.

For Fort Smith metro residents, it could get worse than $0.

Advertisement:

If a majority of voters in Fort Smith metro counties do not support the plan, yet it passes statewide, then state highway officials and business and political leaders in central and Northwest Arkansas will have a new political reality from which to exert leverage on future funding programs and budget decisions.

If that happens, $0 could be more certain than surprising.

Five Star Votes: 
Average: 3.9 (9 votes)

Like This Article? Share It!

Comments

disingenuous, if not insulting

Spot on and par for the course when it comes to the AHTD and Fort Smith leadership. Fort Smith was similarly shafted with the initial GARVEE bond program (1999). Next year, fourteen years after the program passed and was subseqently extended, they're finally about get around to reconstructing 540 from I-40 to Rogers Avenue, a stretch of highway traveled by 55,000 cars daily. Treatment is similar from Oklahoma. Anyone remember when there was steady talk of looping 540 from the Oklahoma stateline to somewhere near Muldrow? Not even on the radar anymore. Meanwhile, unemployment in Sequoyah/LeFlore is highest in the state of Oklahoma. So many infrastructure projects, so little funding or political will/leadership.
Spot on and par for the course when it comes to the AHTD and Fort Smith leadership. Fort Smith was similarly shafted with the initial GARVEE bond program (1999). Next year, fourteen years after the program passed and was subseqently extended, they're finally about get around to reconstructing 540 from I-40 to Rogers Avenue, a stretch of highway traveled by 55,000 cars daily. Treatment is similar from Oklahoma. Anyone remember when there was steady talk of looping 540 from the Oklahoma stateline to somewhere near Muldrow? Not even on the radar anymore. Meanwhile, unemployment in Sequoyah/LeFlore is highest in the state of Oklahoma. So many infrastructure projects, so ...>> Read the entire comment.

Dumb idea or bold action?

Since we can't rely on the state government, the good ol' boy transportation department or our elected congressmen to find funding for our infrastructure needs, here’s a different idea: go it alone with a four-county regional road tax. Yes, another tax, but for us a better alternative to the proposed statewide road tax. A regional road tax would keep all revenues in the local economy instead of being mostly to the benefit of central and NW Arkansas. Voters in Fort Smith and now Van Buren have shown a willingness to pass taxes to improve infrastructure so long as they know exactly where the money is going and see the benefit. So the goals would be simple, straightforward and benefit all four primary counties in the MSA: build the I-49 Arkansas River Bridge (Crawford and Sebastian counties) and complete the I-540 loop back to I-40 (Le Flore and Sequoyah counties). Once these two projects are complete and paid off, the tax goes away. “But these projects are very expensive; won’t that require a whole lot of tax dollars for many years?” Yes, but just maybe if we take the initiative, the state(s) and feds will match funding and expedite I-49 completion to Texarkana once the traffic starts flowing south across the river. The state has made similar funding partnerships with local governments in the recent past. “What about being a team player?” Yeah, this flies in the face of our new cooperative selves, but sometimes bold action is required when your economic future is at stake. Besides, a completed I-49 benefits all of western Arkansas from Bella Vista to Texarkana and the bridge is the most obvious obstacle. We have to do something. Being passive means most of us won’t be around to drive a completed I-49 and the Fort Smith regional economy can't wait decades more for Little Rock, Oklahoma City and Washington to do anything for us. Now, somebody poke holes in this admittedly pie-in-the-sky idea.
Since we can't rely on the state government, the good ol' boy transportation department or our elected congressmen to find funding for our infrastructure needs, here’s a different idea: go it alone with a four-county regional road tax. Yes, another tax, but for us a better alternative to the proposed statewide road tax. A regional road tax would keep all revenues in the local economy instead of being mostly to the benefit of central and NW Arkansas. Voters in Fort Smith and now Van Buren have shown a willingness to pass taxes to improve infrastructure so long as they know exactly where the money is going and see the benefit. So the goals would be simple, ...>> Read the entire comment.

smart and bold

Your idea is bold and smart, which are two reasons it will never gain traction. Next time try an idea that is less innovative, progressive and practical.