A General question

Riff Raff, by Michael Tilley
mtilley@thecitywire.com

Dear Attorney General Dustin McDaniel:

What with all the time you spend fighting payday lenders and studying the layout of the governor’s office and responding to letters from Arkansas House and Senate members who have important questions about who is supposed to keep the ditches clean and whether blue lights on emergency vehicles should flash or rotate, I sure hate to bother you with a question about the Fort Smith Board of Directors.

And this is probably not a valid request sent through the correct channels. I’ll just hope this open letter and the e-mail sent to your nice spokesman fella will warrant some response — even if it is one of those nice letters where you use a bunch of sentences and quote chapter and verse of state law to essentially tell me you wouldn’t touch with a 10-foot pole the goings-on at the Fort Smith Board of Directors.

Not that anyone would blame you for dodging this question. In fact, the one or two times you come to Fort Smith during your gubernatorial campaign, might I suggest the following answer if anyone asks your thoughts on Fort Smith municipal government: “Next question, please.”

Anyway, here’s the deal.

For several months now members of the Fort Smith Board have created a fuss over the future of trash collection in the city. Several years ago, the Board agreed to a plan to fully automate the city’s trash collection. But with less than 10% of households fully automated, four Board members approved just a few months ago a hybrid plan that leaves some trash collected the old-fashioned way.

A few folks said the hybrid plan was needed to best address trash collection in Fort Smith’s older neighborhoods. Others said the hybrid system ended any chance of realizing savings from a fully automated system.

That debate really doesn’t matter now. On Thursday (Aug. 23), the four members of the Board who had opposed the fully automated plan, suddenly switched their votes and re-engaged the plan to fully automate the city’s trash collection. This vote switch came after months of conflict that includes an ongoing citizen initiative to get the issue on the city’s November ballot.

Which almost brings us to the question for you. You attorney-types like to lay out the facts in an orderly fashion. Here goes.
• A vote on automation was not on the Aug. 23 Board agenda, and only a unanimous vote of the Board can place an item on the agenda at the last minute.

• Out of the blue, a City Director calls for a vote to return to the fully automated plan.

• With basically no discussion, the four Directors previously opposed to full automation agreed to the vote. The three Directors who have been for fully automation clearly appeared to have been caught off guard, and asked several questions skeptical of the sudden move.

• When the item was then approved for a vote, it passed unanimously, with the four Directors previously opposed to full automation voting to reverse their decision and end months of unnecessary drama caused by their previous opposition to full automation.

• This all happened within just a few minutes.

Question: Would you send some of your primo investigators to Fort Smith for a few days to explain how the four Directors who appeared to be in complete lockstep on their position reversal DID NOT discuss this action prior to the board meeting?

We all know that to plan a vote outside of a meeting is a clear violation of the law and basic public trust in this municipal governing body. We also know that sometimes appearance can be deceptive; you know, like that innocent-until-proven-guilty rule when the IRS comes a-calling.

Advertisement:

Most in Fort Smith who give a damn about this sort of thing believe the four Board members either talked directly or through a proxy to arrange this sudden vote. To be more blunt, many in Fort Smith are more likely to believe that Elvis, riding on a unicorn and dropped off by a UFO flown by Amelia Earhart, took a crap on their lawn than to believe these four Board members didn’t somehow organize their vote outside what is allowed by law.

Personally, I didn’t get a good look at who was flying the UFO.

Five Star Votes: 
Average: 4.1 (20 votes)

Like This Article? Share It!

Comments

cookies and koolaid

Wasn't there an issue several years ago about board members getting together unofficially "for cookies and koolaid"?

What are the odds....

..bearing in mind zero is the lower limit, of this happening naturally....right here in the good ol' natural state? We do have and have had for awhile, a group of people toying with power here don't we? Could it be they are no longer the bankers, oil men, railroaders or any of the old time robber baron types? Could it be they are for the most part just regular people whose paths have crossed and working together seems like a good way to get what they want before everyone else? "It's about time" people realize this especially with 4 Directors making it so obvious.

Harris v. City of Fort Smith

We need that citizen watchdog who blew the whistle the last time the BOD was conducting one-on-one discussions of city business outside of public view (in the previous case, gaining pre-approval to buy the old cracker factory in downtown) in violation of the FOIA. Oh nevermind, Mr. Harris is one of the anti-automators. Guess somebody else will have to do the FOIA dirty work this time. At least the anti-automators cannot claim ignorance of the law.

Glad someone came out and said it point blank

This smells like sketchy politics in the beginning, and well, seems to be the only way they could squish the ballot. you watch someone will try to strike the vote because "It's already the policy and it doesn't change anything" Except the number of votes it takes to change it back.

Telepathy. The answer to how

Telepathy. The answer to how four directors could simultaneously do an about-face of such spectacular proportions without any prior discussion among themselves is TELEPATHY: transference of information by means of a vibratory current linking one brain to another. There was not a tin foil hat in sight that could have blocked the powerful high frequency vibrations that evening. Shame on anyone who would suspect chicanery or collusion among the four, who suddenly and identically want nothing more than to "move on."

Thank you Michael for your story

Yes, there must have been a meeting. Or should we more accurately state, telephone calls. As long as personal phones are used, no one will ever find out. No Director will ask for another's telephone log because they are all guilty of the same thing. How do I know this? One of the Director (of the 4) told me! Why wouldn't the other 3 bring this up in the meeting? Because they probably discussed their own opposition to the other 4 by phone as well. Plus they won, leave it alone. Perhaps the FOI laws are archaic and this behavior is necessary. Maybe not. Either way, the law exists. Michael, subpeona their personal phones. That is where the answer lies.

Housing authority

thank you for your good work. Now please shine some light on the housing authority and all the NEW houses they build. What is wrong with fixing up old houses?? answer(No builders will make money) but old houses already have utilities and sewer and streets.

trash bins on fire

To collude in violation of the public meetings act, which isn't the first time this concern has been raised with a few involved, means these four were prepared in advance to lie about not meeting secretively, serially, or by proxy. It disturbs me that these four find lying so easy...especially to the very citizens that voted them into position.

Tilley

Tilley, We all know it goes on. Always has-alway will. Just funny that after Merry is asked to step down and Weber has been told she is an embarrassment to her mother, things changed (telepathy I think it was called) Bet this ain't over yet either................