Frank Sharum, Unifirst, Lend A Hand & How Business Is Done

If you attended the directors meeting last night, or watched by TV,  you might have walked away kind of dazed or at least curious, how business is done in Fort Smith.
 
First, you have Kevin Settle, who must really hate the “competitive bidding” process, by not only pushing "city only" trash pickup over honoring the bidding process, but successfully making a motion to table the awarding of the uniform supply service contract with the city.  Unifirst and Cintas, both large uniform service companies were the apparent competing bidders in the uniform service supply contract.  Unifirst was the low bidder, with a bid that over the span of the contract was a significant savings to the taxpayers of Fort Smith.  This issue should have been a simple, straight forward act, but no, Kevin Settle had to preach down to the people and explain what everybody already knew.   And why would the purchasing manager for the city, Alie Bahsoon, have a “purchasing committee”, is the job he has too big for Mr Bahsoon?   So this awarding of the uniform contract is tabled for another two weeks.     Kevin Settle needs to accept the fact he can’t pick and choose who to do business with when he is being responsible for spending the taxpayers money.
 
Then Frank Sharum, a very successful, hardworking businessman addresses the board about his experience with the city of Fort Smith.  He stated he met with the city administrator and parks director back in February about a downtown job he was to do for the city.  The city offered no real specific set of plans, Frank had his own personnel work up a specific set of plans.  He stated he was to be the sub-contractor and was working within a specific dollar allowance.  He stated the allowance was too generous for the job.  He could have just kept the excess money, but instead, chose to be honest and offered to do some additional work Pam Weber was trying to get done on the riverfront.   Apparently from that February meeting, all was well, but when it was time to do the job, the parks department and city hall told Frank, the funds were specifically for one job and he could not do the extra work.  Is there any wonder why Fort Smith isn’t growing like other nearby cities?   To make matters worse, an article in “The City Wire”, I thought tried to make Frank look like the bad guy.  Frank started fresh out of college with nothing but a name that was synonymous with landscaping and nurseries in Fort Smith.  The business he built is not just in Fort Smith, but he has a nursery of equal size if not larger in northwest Arkansas and has clients all over.  One notable client being Alice Walton and the Crystal Bridges Museum in Bentonville.   But it was ironic that the same night Frank spoke,  our board, with the exception of Pam Weber and George Catsavis,  voted to accept $37,500 of a $150,000 loan made to Lend A Hand and Barlee Properties over 10 years ago that has never been repaid.  Can you see the difference in how some are treated in Fort Smith? 

Five Star: 
Average: 3.2 (13 votes)

Comments

great comment jack

the answer to your question mr swink is yes! we all see the difference on how some people are treated in fort smith!

Frank Sharum, Unifirst and Lend a Hand

If I understood the meeting: Frank Sharum offered his services and products to improve the appearance of Garrison Avenue. Director Weber has raised private funds from individuals and organizations in Fort Smith for this project and The City Administrator, Ray Gossack, said "NO WAY" This issuse was thoroughly and inaccurately reported in both the TCW and the SW Times. There was no motive on either Mr. Sharum or Ms. Weber's part to abscond with federal funding. They, unlike Mr. Settle and the powers that be, were making an honest effort to improve the appearance of our city. We have a very successful businessman offering time, talen and product, a director who is out raising money from the public, also federal funding for streetscapes and we cannot get the project done because of the pettiness nd short=sighted vision of our city adminstrator and the directors. I wonder how the downtown business owners feel about this latest event. The citizens of Fort Smith have lost again.

Pay attention

There were a few meetings. An through them it was discovered that here was more landscaping allocation than what was needed, need for trees elsewhere, more trees bought than needed, refusal to commit fraud, an appeal to bail out an overextended businessman, a rebuttal that a bailout wasn't needed, and then some coverup. The whole thing stinks and the stink surrounds Weber.

Fort Smith looses

Fort Smith is the big looser in all of this. What I find sad is that Mr. Gosack was given the opportunity to respond to all comments at the BOD meeting and said noting publicly but as soon as the cameras were off he was more than willing to give his misconstrued and unverifiable theory of misdeeds by others. I believe this was a miscommunication and at the point of the first meeting with Ray and when it was later discovered that inaccurate information was given, it was easier to play the blame game rather than man up and admit it. Dir Weber and Mr. Sharum are owed a thank you and an public apology and nothing less.

Seriously?

Weber needs an apology? She's the one who caused this whole mess by trying to do something good, but sticking her hands in any money she thought she could use, and then "unilaterally" tried to get it reimbursed after the money she promised wasn't there. Sharum threw her under the bus, and probably rightly so. I don't doubt they are trying to do something good for the city, but good grief do it above board.

Apologies Owed

You must have missed the meeting where Mr. Sharum didn't place blame on Dir Weber but squarely on the city administration.

Add new comment

Refresh Type the characters you see in this picture.
Type the characters you see in the picture; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.  Switch to audio verification.