Fort Smith Board to consider animal control rules

story by Aric Mitchell
amitchell@thecitywire.com

The Fort Smith Board of Directors tussled over voting on preliminary recommendations from the Animal Services Advisory Board (ASAB) and received a “crash course” on tree and power line conflicts Tuesday (Dec. 11).

The two items filled out the board’s noon study session at the Main Library on Rogers Avenue and began with a presentation from ASAB chairperson Nichole Morgan.

Morgan shared suggestions from the ASAB regarding recommended but incomplete changes to the city’s animal control ordinance, adding that it would “probably take one more of our two-hour meetings” to reach a consensus on finalization.

One of the delays for ASAB was further discussion and agreement on owner fines for first and second offenses when pets are picked up unattended.

City Director Philip Merry wished to provide incentives via fine reduction or waiver for offending owners who opt to have their pet spayed or neutered. Morgan believe fines need some kind of “weight” in order to be effective. She requested, and was granted, more time, to discuss the matter with the seven other members of the ASAB. But that did not stop Merry from motioning the proposed changes be added to the agenda “as is” for the regular meeting next Tuesday (Dec. 18). Director George Catsavis seconded.

“Why are we placing it on the agenda if they’re not completed?” asked Director Don Hutchings.

Director Kevin Settle reminded that “a document like this can be approved, but can always be altered or changed in the future.”

“There’s a huge body of work that’s been achieved here,” Merry said.

“I’m ready to get this over and done with,” Catsavis added. “We’ve talked about it for months and everybody’s wore out.”

Catsavis continued: “Like Kevin (Settle) said, we can always go back and adjust this. But I think this is a good deal, and I’m ready to get it over with. Everybody’s worked hard on this—the board and everybody—and I think this is a good compromise right now.”

“That’s very unusual, (to vote) for something that’s not completed,” Hutchings said.

Catsavis asked Morgan’s thoughts on the matter.

“I don’t feel right signing off on saying, ‘Yes, you guys move forward completely,’” Morgan said.

Nevertheless, the motion was not withdrawn and will come to a vote next Tuesday.

“My opinion is if the chairperson says this is what we need to do, then we need to give the chairperson what they’re asking for,” Settle said.

The full list of recommendations that were presented on Tuesday are available as a 25-page document within the study session meeting packet available on the city of Fort Smith website.

TREES AND LINES
On the issue of trees and power lines, Jarod Cassada, forester for Oklahoma Gas and Electric Co. (OG&E), presented the board with an overview along with information on “responsible” tree planting in relation to utilities.

Cassada’s presentation addressed the company’s transmission upgrade project along N. 50th St., Free Ferry, N. 74th St., and Euper Lane, which drew ire from property owners and the governing body of the Museum of the Hardwood Tree.

In September Museum representative Bob Worley told The City Wire he was “disappointed” in OG&E’s actions.

“Cutting trees down is not good for the community or the planet, and shouldn’t be done unless it is absolutely necessary,” Worley said.

Dr. David Harper, DDS, of Harper Orthodontics and one of the affected property owners, agreed.

“They gave me notice, and they did pay me, but it’s not about the money,” Harper said. “I just don’t want the trees cut down. Free Ferry is a landmark street in the city and they’ve just butchered it. It’s a path of destruction through here. They’re removing 150-year old trees right and left and using no judgment whatsoever.”

Advertisement:

On Tuesday Cassada reiterated what OG&E Community Affairs Manager Rob Ratley told The City Wire in September: that OG&E directives come from Little Rock-based Southwest Power Pool, a Regional Transmission Organization set up by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission “to ensure reliable supplies of power, adequate transmission infrastructure, and competitive wholesale prices of electricity,” according to the organization’s website.

“I understand that businesses have to be profitable and do what is in their best interests,” said Director Pam Weber. “But a lot of people feel like their property has been devalued. So what I’m asking is, could you work with us in the future to do this in less populated areas? Not through the center of a neighborhood.”

Cassada expressed that OG&E would be willing to work with the city, but that moving the Free Ferry transmission upgrade project would have resulted in “significant” cost increases, which would likely have been passed on to customers, and would have resulted in the loss of “probably four times the number of trees that were removed in this 20-foot easement.”

According to a 2006 study from American Forests, Fort Smith is already at 13% tree canopy, less than half of the 40% that is recommended for good health and lower than Fayetteville (30%), Little Rock (27%), Van Buren (18%) and Jonesboro (17%).

Five Star Votes: 
Average: 3.6 (9 votes)

Like This Article? Share It!

Comments

The call of the wild...

The dog that caused it all..We already had an ordinance that said he couldn't run loose and that's exactly what he was doing. They just stopped enforcing it for some reason. Here we are years, not months later, with who knows $50,000 less to run the city, even more unhappy people, and we are about to have an ordinance that says he can't run loose again. Why?

Our city needs to be

Our city needs to be concentrating on how we are years behind all the economic growth in Rogers, a smaller town than us. As Mr. Sharum said we are going to El Dorado sooner than later. Work on progression!!!!

animal panel versus 2 directors

Citizens – your neighbors – brought it to the board and demanded action. The board had bigger things to work on and created a citizen panel to deal with it. The citizen panel has done their job and is presenting it to the board. Only Pam Weber and Phillip Merry keep thrashing this issue. Merry even wanted to force his personal dog agenda through before the panel returned their recommendations. Merry and Weber are like two crying kids running around in circles not knowing what they are there for.

Weber, Merry, are just blowin' in the wind..

Most likely the neighbors have far more experience...I really don't think somebody saw a dog and then went to their first city council meeting. I think most likely it was more like something else they could mention since they were already there. Seen a lot of progress here in the last 25 years? What can stay the same at these meetings for a quarter of a century?

Amazed at Merry

Continual theatrics to get his way. Why doesn't somebody place the guy in his naughty chair! Leadership is not dictating and acting irrationally. Leadership begins with effective listening and staying rational In the meantime, all the wrong headlines dominate our local news. No wonder jobs are leaving and nothing is replacing them. Be smart. Table any decision until the police chief and prosecuting attorney have a chance to work something out with the findings of this animal board's final report.

Animal Panel

Actually, it was only one citizen who brought this to the board, at every single meeting, until a citizen panel was created. Tammy Trouillon's (who is on the Animal Services Board) little dog was unfortunately attacked by a larger dog and she, rightly so, wanted someone to be responsible for that. We had a leash law in place at that time. My neighbors take care of abandoned cats. They have all of them fixed and they take they to the vet when they are sick, etc. They called to find out what the cost would be to microchip and vaccinate five of those cats with the new ordinance in place. Over $300, which they can't afford So what are they supposed to do?